Enhancing the biomethane production from tannery wastewater by thermal pretreatment

O. Achouri, A. Panico, M. Bencheikh-Lehocine, K. Derbal, F. Pirozzi

Abstract


Anaerobic Digestion (AD) is often chosen as a suitable treatment for tannery wastewater (TWW) since this waste stream is rich in organic matter. Nevertheless, the high organic load and the presence of compounds commonly used in the leather production process and responsible for inhibiting the biological activity (e.g. chromium and sulphide) limit the full capitalization of the whole potential in producing biomethane from this low-cost and interesting source of renewable energy. Pretreatment of substrates is considered by most as the solution to overcome this negative aspect as a higher biomethane production in a shorter time is expected after that. Actually in this study three different temperatures have been tested, in detail, 90, 80, and 70 °C, to pretreat a real TWW prior to a mesophilic AD process conducted in a series of batch biomethane potential (BMP) tests aimed at evaluating the optimum temperature that can result in increasing the soluble COD content and consequently the AD performance . After the pretreatment, the soluble COD concentration increased from a minimum of 11% to a maximum of 80%: which resulted in an increase of the biomethane production compared with the raw substrate. The highest temperature (90°C) investigated gave the highest increasing in soluble COD but had a negative effect on AD process performance, as the final production of biomethane was 178 ml CH4/g TVS, more than 4 folds less than the maximum yield of 891 ml CH4/g TVS obtained from the sample pre-treated at 80°C where the increase in soluble COD was by 57%. These results highlight the critical aspect of the thermal pretreatment: the increase of temperature can enhance the biomethane production as well as reduce it, therefore the choice of the most suitable temperature depends strongly on the characteristics of the substrate and it can be made only through experimental tests.

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Esposito, L. Frunzo, A. Panico, and F. Pirozzi, Enhanced bio-methane production from co-digestion of different organic wastes, Environmental technology, 33(24), (2012) 2733-2740.

Y.Chen, J. J. Cheng, Anaerobic processes in waste treatment. Water Environment Research, 77(6), (2005) 1347-1388.

B. Ruffino, G. Campo, G. Genon, E. Lorenzi, D. Novarino, G. Scibilia, and M. Zanetti, Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge in a wastewater treatment plant by means of mechanical and thermal pre-treatments: performance, energy, and economic assessment. Bioresource technology, 175, (2015) 298-308.

A. Lagerkvist, F. Morgan-Sagastume, The effects of substrate pretreatment on anaerobic digestion systems: a review. Waste Management, 32(9), (2012) 1634-1650.

E. Neyens, J. Baeyens, A review of thermal sludge pre-treatment processes to improve dewaterability, Journal of hazardous materials, 98(1), (2003) 51-67.

C. Bougrier, C. Albasi, J. P. Delgenès, and H. Carrère, Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilization and anaerobic biodegradability. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 45(8), (2006) 711-718.

T. A. Shepherd, Pretreatment technologies for increasing biogas potential of agricultural wastes, (2006).

R. T. Haug, D. C. Stuckey, J. M. Gossett, and P. L. McCarty, Effect of thermal pretreatment on digestibility and dewaterability of organic sludges. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation, (1978) 73-85.

Z. Mladenovska, H. Hartmann, T. Kvist, M. Sales-Cruz, R. Gani, and B. K. Ahring, Thermal pretreatment of the solid fraction of manure: impact on the biogas reactor performance and microbial community. Water Science and Technology, 53(8), (2006) 59-67.

T. L. Y. Y.Noike, Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by thermal Pretreatment Water Science and Technology, 26(3-4), (1992)857-866.

A. Mottet, J. P. Steyer, S. Déléris, F. Vedrenne, J. Chauzy, and H. Carrère, Kinetics of thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolyzed waste activated sludge. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 46(2), (2009) 169-175. 12.

I. Ferrer, S. Ponsá, F. Vázquez, and Font, Increasing biogas production by thermal (70 C) sludge pre-treatment prior to thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 42(2), (2008) 186-192. 13.

H. Carrère, B. Sialve, and N. Bernet Improving pig manure conversion into biogas by thermal and thermochemical pretreatments. Bioresource Technology, 100(15), (2009) 3690-3694.

J. Ariunbaatar, A. Panico, D. H.Yeh, F. Pirozzi, P. N. Lens, and G. Esposito, Enhanced mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste by thermal pretreatment: Substrate versus digestate heating. Waste Management, 46, (2015) 176-181.

L. Pontoni, G. d'Antonio, G. Esposito, M. Fabbricino, L. Frunzo, and F. Pirozzi, Thermal pretreatment of olive mill wastewater for efficient methane production: control of aromatic substances degradation by monitoring cyclohexane carboxylic acid. Environmental technology, 36(14), (2015) 1785-1794.

O. Achouri, A. Panico, M. Bencheikh-Lehocine, K. Derbal, F. Pirozzi, Effect of the Inoculum/Substrate ratio on the anaerobic digestion of tannery wastewater. Submitted to Environmental Management Journal 2016.

D. G. Cirne, X. Paloumet, L. Björnsson, M. M. Alves, and B. Mattiasson, Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste—effects of lipid concentration. Renewable energy, 32(6), (2007) 965-975.

S. Jain, S. Jain, I. T.Wolf, J. Lee, and Y. W.Tong, A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, (2015) 142-154.

S. Goswami, D. Mazumder, Scope of biological treatment for composite tannery wastewater, International journal of Environmental science, 5, No3, (2014).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.